Roland Emmerich's 2012 looks all kind of brainless CGI-laden awesome (despite that pinhead John Cusack). Unfortunately, according to an increasing number of reputable scientists and mathematicians, the Mayan prophecy at the center of the whole premise actually points to 2220 as the target year for universal annihilation, and not 2012 as Mr. Emmerich and a host of nutbag bunker-dwellers assert.
The question now is, what the hell am I going to do with all these batteries and cans of Spam? Think The Salvation Army will take them in lieu of a donation to the bell-ringing Santa Claus outside of Wal-Mart?
8 comments:
Now that we're getting close to the year 2012, all of a sudden scientists are saying the world is supposed to end in 2220 instead? Doubtful. Sounds like something made up to stop the mass hysteria.
ha ha ha! I've stocked up too on the Spam but we ended eating it all....
The Mayan's now it all!
No need to unload the stores, Crab: Spam® lasts forever unopened, and you can _always_ use batteries.
And seriously, what do you have against Cusack other than his sister? He's good in most everything he does, IMO.
Ever since I heard the story about John Cusack's behavior shooting "Grosse Point Blank" I have been grossed out by the sight of him. Yuck.
(For those who don't know-TMI-he pooped in his pants, changed, and just left the disgusting pants lying around for an assistant to pick up. This was reported in a number of legit sources at the time.)
Hey! Guess what??? Y'all just saw the entire movie in the 2:48 trailer.
What an unmitigated piece of crap!
Oh, yeah. And California was supposed to fall into the ocean back in 1969!
i cant wait for the end of the world. its going to make all that cgi stuff look like a bunch of dr. seuss renderings on a sidewalk with a 2 year old chalk wielding mind behind it. they hired that same 2 year old to write G.I. Joe and both Transformers.
when will Y2K get the remake it deserves?
Post a Comment