In Sudan, the problem is women wearing trousers. Women like Lubna Hussein, a journalist who is on trial for breaking a law against pants on females. Should Lubna be convicted, she would face 40 lashes, which doesn't really sound like a punishment to me, but whatever.
In America we have the opposite problem - women not wearing trousers. In this country, the fattest pieces of white trash shit insist on parading around in shorts and mini-skirts...and there needs to be a law against it. Fatties convicted of not wearing long pants, or mumus, or something that covers up their disgusting folds and rolls and cellulite, would be forced to eat cauliflower and other icky healthy shit until they either lose all the fat or agree to never make a spectacle of their nastiness again. A second offense would mean beheading.
How America Is Different From Sudan
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Posted by Melvin Ayatollahofrock'nrolla at 1:54 PM
Labels: Lubna Hussein
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Aww..a certain homo doth protest too much.
Maybe then America could force the law onto the UK too?
OK...a friend of mine lives in a small Minnesota town. The Sudanese have f'g taken over the town! The city council has even put up a vote to get signs installed all over the town in the Sudanese language, so those people can drive around & find their way. THATS ridic. The classrooms are full of the kids and the town is changing due to this influx. It's not good. Is pissing off the natives!
Rox
I agree with the banning of fat people in tight clothes........
As a fat woman, I will agree to your terms but only if you also abolish skin tight shirts on pregnant women. Blech!
Women wearing trousers!!! Fuck that. How about stopping the female genital castration.
Post a Comment