Did Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban make a principled stand by not selling their baby pics...or did they just not like the offers they were getting?
"She wanted $3 million and we weren't going to pay that," a rep for one celeb rag said. $3 million is what Matthew McConaughey got...and it's twice what Jessica Alba got. You mean Sunday Rose's pics aren't worth more than little Whatever McConaughey's? No wonder Nicole refused the deal.
Oh, I'm sorry...they're above that sort of shameless kid-pimping. Right. Sure.
Not So Principled?
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Posted by Crabbie at 8:18 AM
Labels: Keith Urban, Nicole Kidman
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I think Nicole did the right thing. Her baby is not beneath Smelly, Matthew M. or Jessica Alba. Besides lets put the blame on the scumbags who started this whole baby pimping Show! Brangelina has turned having kids into a Business.
Halle Berry is the only one who has any Decency these days. As well as, Salma Hayek & Usher.
Yeah, they're above it, cuz this story is probably bullshit, unbelievably shocking as that is.
I don't believe that story at all, notice they didn't name the rag that made the offer...Not everyone is in competition with Skankie and pitt stain...
Nicole's baby is probably an ugly little ginger just like her mom. Plastic surgery and botox doesn't cover the kids fug. Plus the addictive drug genes from Keith, she is doomed poor fugly little Sunday.
Post a Comment