Kimberley Kohn, an attorney for brain-dead Nick Hogan pal John Graziano, claims the sudden divorce filing by Hulk's wife Linda is part of a ploy intended to protect the family's assets when a civil suit is finally filed against them on Graziano's behalf. It's all too complicated for the Crabster so I'll just let St. Petersburg Times writer Tamara El-Khoury explain it:
Kohn said Monday a divorce could be one step the Bolleas could take to try to protect assets. That's because it could cut Terry [Hulk] Bollea's assets in half, she said.
Nick Bollea faces a felony charge of reckless driving with serious bodily injury, and attorneys for John Graziano's estranged parents have said they intend to file a lawsuit as a result of the crash.But if the Supra and the Viper are not registered to both parents, it could be harder to go after Mrs. Bollea individually, Kohn said. The mother's degree of control over who used the vehicles would have to be determined.
I've got a simpler solution to all of this. Instead of somebody suing somebody for money, how about just making the person directly responsible pay for their actions in an appropriate manner? Nick Hogan, I think, should be the only one held liable for Graziano's injuries. I mean he was the idiot driving the car. It's immaterial how he got to be an idiot in the first place - at some point little dumb-asses with dumb-ass parents who raised them to have no respect for society or even human life have to be taught the concept of personal accountability.
What would constitute a suitable punishment though? Jail? A suspended license? Too unimaginative. No, I think Nick should be subjected to something more poetic. I think Nick, for at least the next ten years, should have to live with John Graziano. He should have to keep John company during every waking moment. He should have to feed John his baby food, and clean the shit from him, and change his catheter and whatever else is required from a maintenance stand-point. Too extreme you say? Well, the Crabster is not without compassion even for asshats like Nick Hogan. If at any time Nick should become unable to take it anymore, he should have the choice to opt out of his punishment and accept what's behind door number 2 - a bullet to the back of the fucking head.
That, my friends, is Crabbie justice.
(source)
10 comments:
i LIKE crabbie justice!!! very appropriate!
^^Yes...BUT since he is a minor the parents are also responsible. I don't see why it should matter if they are divorced, he's a minor so why pick one parent to blame?
Hate to blame the victim here, but why wasn't the guy wearing a seat belt? Same for Princess Di. Both probably would have escaped w/o serious injury had they just buckled up. That said, I agree that Nick should be the only one held accountable. Sad that every time something tragic happens to someone it's like winning the lotto for the family.
Oh Please. Winning the LOTTO?!
The Graziano's formerly healthy, strapping, military veteran son is now a HUMAN VEGETABLE. Do you really believe whatever financial settlement they are awarded by the courts is going to put them on "easy street"? You must be either very young or very ignorant. (or both)
The cost to care for patients in a persistant vegetative state can run upwards of 150K per year-- and that's if they can care for him at home. From what I understand re: this young man's condition-- there is no way he's ever going "home".
So with hospital care those figures could easily quadruple-- at the very least. (and that's just BASIC care-- not counting treatments, surgical procedures, etc) And of course, they will probably attempt some sort of experimental surgery, if feasible.
And no, you *shouldn't* blame the victim. Seatbelt or no-- Nick (shit for brains) Bollea was racing a sports car and should be held accountable.
While I too prefer "Crabbie Justice", the fact is that unfortunately, Nick was just 17 years old at the time of the accident. And since he was underage, his parents are technically liable. (although it remains to be seen how the court proceed pertaining to Nick's liability)
At any rate, the bottom line is that John Graziano will need care FOR LIFE. Even if Nick was made to participate (LMAO) in the future care of John-- the type of care he will require costs serious money. Nick certainly doesn't have it... so it's going to come from the family coffers whether we like it or not.
I hope the Graziano's are awarded everything the court deems necessary to give their son the best care money can buy. As for Nick, underage or not-- he committed a very serious crime and I would like to see him punished by the courts accordingly.
I don't think that is extreme at all. they should have to pay all medical bills and maybe a little extra no need for millions though...but why would it be too much to ask for him to care for his friend. someone has to right? the punishment should definatly fit the crime. he should also lose his lisence for at least 5 years.
There is a reason FLORIDA is called the sue-me-state.
I lived there. Here is an average day:
Wake up. Sue someone.
Make coffee. Sue someone.
Brush teeth. Sue someone.
Get newspaper. Sue someone...
you get the idea.
My girlfriend's brother, in his house, next door neighbor needed to borrow sugar... came over, slipped in his front yard... sued him.
That is true.
Oh, yeah Florida! Did you catch this disgusting story?
"A police officer has sued the family of a 1-year-old boy who nearly drowned because she slipped and injured a knee responding to their 9-1-1 rescue call." Andrea Eichhorn, a police sergeant in Casselberry, Florida, responded to the pool accident, and now "claims the boy's family left a puddle of water on the floor, causing her fall during the rescue efforts. She broke her knee and missed two months of work." So she's suing the Cosmillo family. "It's a situation where the Cosmillos have caused these problems, brought them on themselves, then tried to play the victim," says her attorney, David Heil. Joey Cosmillo, the infant in question, suffered severe brain damage and lives in a nursing home now. (Rene Stutzman, "Cop who fell on the job sues family of baby who almost drowned", Orlando Sentinel, Oct. 10;
There is a place in Hell for a lawyer who agrees to sue the family of a brain damaged baby....
Oh sure 3:23, but is it possible that since you WEREN'T FUCKING THERE you don't know the whole story? How do you know these people didn't leave their one year old unattended--otherwise, how does a 1 year old have an "accident" so severe around a pool that if he WERE being attended to it would have left him brain-dead???? And how do you know that these obviously oh-so-attentive fuckbags didn't allow the rest of their house to fall into disrepair? Which then makes the cop who had to respond to a couple of shitbags who don't take care of their house OR their kid hellbound for wanting to have their irresponsibility brought to bear upon them?? Get your stories and your facts straight before you sentence hard-working cops to hell. Yes, there are accidents, but when a 1 year old has this kind of a pool accident, who do you really blame?? Oh yeah, the cops, because they are all crooked right?? Fucktard.
The post prior to mine was either made by the stupidest human on the planet, or someone who does not understand that sarcasm is hard to pull off in text, and takes some finesse.
Sarcasm?? Nice try. Your last line belies your ridiculous try at relieving your retarded conscience. Try being a cop FOR ONE DAY, you fucking loser. And no, I'm not one, but I know plenty, and they take a lot of shit from a lot of assholes, and you're probably one of them. Yes, there are som ebad cops, but there are a lot more stupid asshole citizens. Like you.
Post a Comment