
The ParisExposed controversy may have gotten a little more interesting. According to The Rad Report, a "super credible source" has revealed that Paris Hilton herself owns the sex tapes that were allegedly acquired by David Hans Schmidt and then sold to Bardia Persa. The source is said to be uncertain as to the extent of Paris's involvement in the ParisExposed website, which is distributing the material for public consumption, but is sure that she is "financially involved."
So is the whole thing a scam cooked up by Paris, Schmidt and Persa? The "storage locker" story a nice advertising gimmick? I don't know. According to another story, Paris and Joe Francis's lawyers are filing a civil suit today, and are seeking a restraining order against ParisExposed. Now you tell me. Would you honestly go so far as to take legal action against an enterprise you secretly belonged to in order to hide your involvement in said entity? I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me that you could get in a lot of trouble for doing that (isn't it fraud or something?). On the surface, it seems that, if Paris does go ahead with legal action, then there's no way she could possibly be secretly involved in the site. Because the crux of the whole case, at least going by Joe Francis's earlier statements, is who owns the rights to the videos. Here's what Francis actually said:
"We want this thing down and we're seeking monetary damages ... They were taken for us only when we were dating. These guys have absolutely no right to use the images - they flat-out put them on the Web with no permission. He messed with the wrong person."
Is Francis talking about all the videos and pictures, or just the ones involving him? And let's say for argument's sake that Paris really does still own the rights to that stuff. Then Joe would really be suing her, wouldn't he? So maybe Joe just thinks like we all do - that Paris was shafted. Maybe Paris wasn't shafted and she just hasn't told Joe. What's going to happen when Joe finds out then? It doesn't seem likely that Francis would be in with cahoots with the others, then go around making statements like he did. You don't try a scam like this then sue yourself. You're just robbing Peter to pay Paul then. I don't know. It's all so confusing. Hopefully, this will all be clarified soon. Because I know I won't be able to sleep until...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Is Paris Her Own Pimp?
Monday, January 29, 2007
Posted by Melvin Ayatollahofrock'nrolla at 11:26 AM
Labels: Paris Hilton
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Ah!
I shall try to help you solve the riddle, and get rid of this horrible weight on your shoulders dear Crabbie! :-)
Yes, of course she owns the rights. It's HER. Imagine if you, Crabbie, would make a sex-video of yourself. *ahem*
Some unknown person wouldn't just swoop down from the skies and claim ownership? It's impossible. She does own the rights, but there is nothing fishy about that.
Also, having found a sex-video in a storage-locker does not mean anything in terms of ownership & legality or right to publish it.
No one can post a sex video of anyone else UNLESS they have explicit consent of that person. This should be in the form of a written modelrelease and including a signature & a copy of the ID to prove the age. If that is not provided, it is ILLEGAL & not only the person depicted can sue, but so will the FBI.
There are codes & regulations for this, you can't just post something like this on the net, no matter how many surfers will claim that you can.
The site will be taken down, since it is illegal & in violation of the laws concering pornography in the USA.
However... The reason Joe Francis is sueing is because HE wanted to make money off it. That's why he is pissed. The reason he keeps on asking during the video if he can publish it, is because a spoken modelrelease will sometimes also be allowed by the court, depending on the situation.
He wanted to publish as well. She just didn't say yes on camera like he wanted her to.
So no, I don't think she is in on it, and she WILL be able to sue their asses off.
Having said that... I still haven't stopped laughing about this. Serves her right, I have seldom disliked a person THIS much.
Hope that cleared it up for you! ;-)
Love your site Crabbie. You add wit & inteligence to the stories, instead of just randomly copying and going "OMG!!!"
Love love love it. :-)
*Dancing darling*
In all honesty, I think I'm kind of in love with this bitch. Warhol would have known what to do with her. Any slut who celebrates her sluttiness, instead of trying to pretend she's girl-next-door-y, is a slut after my own heart.
That reminds me...I wonder how Aniston's latest, (and far too late for purely cosmetic reasons) nose job is feeling these days. I'm sure it's numb and feeling fine. ~dvz
Seriously folks, Paris has all the classic symptoms of a victim of childhood sexual abuse. Nobody gives themselves away like that unless they've been programmed to believe they have no rights to their own body--that it belongs to someone else. And whoever abused her as a child also recorded it, as she always makes sure her most private shots--and thoughts--are publicized for all the world to see. I don't think she can help herself...a victim of mind control, I say.
Crabbie...love your ingenious way of examining fame and fortune with an eye towards reality, and not just fawning all over these idiot celebrities like we owe them something. Thanks!
It can't work in fact, that is exactly what I believe.
Post a Comment